The Who-Decided-This Question
Much of what feels like an unbreakable rule is simply a choice somebody made once and nobody questioned since.
The Who-Decided-This Question separates two things kids tend to blur together: laws of reality that cannot be changed, and decisions made by people that can. When something feels fixed, your child learns to ask who decided this, and discovers that a surprising amount of the world is not a permanent fact but an old choice still running on autopilot.
The mental move is to trace a feature of the world back to its source. Gravity has no author, so it stays. But the school day starting at 8am, the layout of a cereal box, the rule that desks face front, the idea that a job must look a certain way, these all had a decider, which means they had a context, which means they can be reconsidered. Asking who decided turns a wall into a door.
Why it matters
Kids absorb thousands of arrangements as if they were natural law, and that quiet acceptance shapes what they believe is possible for their own lives. A child who can ask who decided this is equipped to question unfair rules respectfully, to see that traditions and defaults were authored by fallible people, and to imagine alternatives instead of assuming the current setup is the only one. In a world full of inherited systems and algorithmic defaults that someone chose for them, this question is the seed of both healthy skepticism and the confidence to make things better.
How to use The Who-Decided-This Question with your child
- Spot the supposed rule. Have your child point to something that feels fixed or just the way things are, in their school, home, or the wider world. Naming it makes it inspectable.
- Ask who decided it. Prompt them to ask whether this is a law of nature or a choice a person made, and to guess who that person or group might have been.
- Ask why they decided it. Have them consider the reason behind the original choice and whether that reason still holds today, since many rules outlive the problem they solved.
- Ask how it could be different. Invite them to imagine a fairer or better version, which turns a passive rule into an active question they could actually raise.
See it in action
Sam, age 14, complained that his group project grade was shared equally even though he did most of the work. Instead of just venting, his mom asked, who decided that. Sam realized it was not a law, it was a choice his teacher made, probably to save time grading. They talked about why that choice existed and how it could be different, perhaps a short individual reflection counting toward each grade. Sam wrote a calm, specific proposal to his teacher, who actually adopted a version of it. Sam learned that the rule that frustrated him had an author, a reason, and therefore a way to be remade.
By age
Keep it concrete and non-threatening, who decided cereal goes in that aisle or that we drive on the right, so they grasp that people make choices.
Apply it to fairness in their own world, classroom rules, chores, screen limits, distinguishing rules with good reasons from ones worth questioning.
Connect it to laws, history, and systems, exploring how rules made long ago still shape life today and how people change them.
Frequently asked questions
Won't this teach my child to question my rules and authority at home?
It teaches them to question respectfully and with reasons, which is what you want from a future adult. You can welcome the question while keeping the rule, here is who decided and here is the reason it still stands. A kid who understands why a rule exists follows it more willingly than one who only obeys.
How do I help my child tell real rules from changeable ones?
Use the nature-versus-people test, gravity and the need for sleep have no author and cannot be voted away, while bedtimes and dress codes were set by people for reasons. Walking through a few clear examples of each builds the instinct. The question is not whether to obey but whether the thing is fixed or chosen.
Is this just going to make my teenager more argumentative?
Channeled well, it makes them more persuasive instead of merely argumentative, because it pushes them past complaining toward understanding the reason and proposing a better version. Ask them to pair every who-decided-this with a constructive how-could-it-be-better. That turns frustration into a proposal, which is a skill that serves them for life.
More Gap Recognition tools
Your child can practice a tool like this every day
Parker Smart Kids turns reasoning into a 15-minute daily habit: 1,800 age-targeted lessons across six thinking dimensions, built by Guinness World Records Puzzle Master Timothy E. Parker.
Try a free lesson See plansPart of the Thinking Tools Library by Timothy E. Parker, Guinness World Records Puzzle Master.